Certificate In Psychology (CPSY) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Get ready for your CPSY Exam with our comprehensive quiz. Challenge yourself with multiple-choice questions featuring detailed hints and explanations. Enhance your knowledge and confidence for the exam.

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Why might growth charts be misleading for assessing a baby's physical growth?

  1. They combine age-specific averages of height and weight for formula-fed and breastfed babies.

  2. They contain separate averages for boys and girls.

  3. They indicate variations from averages in height and weight.

  4. They are compiled using averages from both typically and atypically developing children.

The correct answer is: They combine age-specific averages of height and weight for formula-fed and breastfed babies.

The reasoning behind the answer points to how growth charts are constructed and the implications of using general averages across different feeding methods. Growth charts are meant to represent the typical growth patterns of infants and children based on various data sets. When growth charts include combined data from both formula-fed and breastfed babies, they may obscure fundamental differences in growth trajectories between these two groups. Breastfed and formula-fed infants can show different patterns of growth due to variations in nutritional intake, metabolism, and developmental factors. By combining these distinct feeding populations, a growth chart may not accurately reflect what constitutes healthy growth for a specific infant based solely on their feeding method. This can lead to potential misinterpretations of a baby's growth status, suggesting they are either thriving or not based on a misleading comparison with a heterogeneous average rather than a more relevant standard. In contrast, separating the data for boys and girls also serves to provide more tailored benchmarks for different sexes, and noting variations from the average is important for understanding individual growth; both these practices are generally valid techniques for assessing growth. Moreover, using averages derived from both typically and atypically developing children might introduce a broader range of data, but it could also muddy the interpretation of what's considered healthy growth for typically developing infants. However,